House Judiciary panel votes unanimously for more explains on obstruction probe into Trump

trump obstruction

TL;DR

Find out whats happening in the world as it unfolds. The Raskins who led the Trump legal team. It became obvious to the legal team early on that Russia collusion was not a substantive issue. The Raskins in a reshuffling of Trumps legal team. Doug Collins of Georgia wanted to withdraw his measure. Its unanimousthe House Judiciary Committee wants to know a lot more about the origins of the Justice Departments obstruction probe into Donald Trump. politico reports that collins also sought to withdraw his measure once muellers investigation concluded without making a finding on obstruction. Now that Attorney General William Barr chose to unilaterally exonerate Trump of obstruction even though Mueller did not Democrats are as keen as ever to learn everything possible about the evidence relating to Trumps obstruction. Now Judiciary Chair Jerry Nadler and his Democratic colleagues are just as interested in learning what could have led to such discussions. And some actions that look like obstruction of justice may not be because the law requires an intention to obstruct as well

More Trump Obstruction: